Sketchley's Translations Main Index | Macross Portal |
By AARON SKETCHLEY (aaronsketch@HOTdelete_thisMAIL.com) | Ver 1.4 2024.07.07 |
On my last viewing, I was struck by how the movie is a bridge between the themes Roland Emmerich was exploring in Universal Soldier and Independence Day. On the one hand, you have the Sarcophagus (the ultimate expression of technology being used to reanimate the (recently) dead), and on the other hand, there is the overconfident alien(s) engendering to exploit the Earth—or at least the humans of the Earth—for resources.
Of the three films, 'Universal Soldier' had the better bad guy (arguably what makes or breaks these kinds of films). That's not to say that Jaye Davidson's Ra was bad or badly portrayed. He was the right character for SG-1, just not for the movie. Nevertheless, I did like how Ra was never portrayed as being in a rush, and how he appeared to be somewhat bemused by the reappearance of Earthlings in his domain, and the effects of that. I also feel that Stargate handled the defeat of the aliens much better than Independence Day did—what with having Ra's overconfidence and assumptions play as much a role in his defeat as the luck, courage, and resourcefulness of the Earthlings and their newfound allies.
Ultimately, if you've seen the theatrical version of the movie, you don't have to rush out to find the director's cut (you should be trying to find the director's cut of Alien!) If you're a Stargate fan, it may be worthwhile to see it—if only for the alternative take on the Stargate whirlpool damage (or lack thereof) a buried Stargate causes in the ground.
Stargate: The Ark of Truth is Stargate SG-1 on a big budget, and it looks grandiose; from the sets to the special effects. The most subtle but striking difference, however, is the lighting. The fill light that brightly lit shots in the TV series is toned down, and places that ought to be bathed in deep shadow are, which changes the tone and nature of certain familiar settings. One of the greatest things in this film is that it brings back so many familiar guest characters from the show. Not only is there Tim Guinee as Tomin and the always wonderful Morena Baccarin as Adria, there are also many, many others, such as Doug Abrahams's one-eyed Prior. Hands down the best scene in the film is Teal'c's conversation with Tomin, as it simultaneously addresses Tomin's past and future, as well as recalling the very first episode of Stargate SG-1 and the continuing burden that Teal'c bares. It is a shame that the rest of the film doesn't allow for characters such as Jackson and the Priors, or Vala and Adria a chance to go into similar polemics to address the fundamental issues in the Ori conflict. Instead, we get a kind of dues ex machina, where everything is cleared up by opening a magic box. It's a shame that too much time was spent on the Replicator subplot, as it would have been much more rewarding—albeit a lot less actiony—to see Tomin returning to his people, and having to deal with the regular citizens who still have retain their hard-line views as they weren't 'fixed' by the magic box.
The biggest complaints about the film is: why bring back the Replicators? While Marrick's justification sounds good on the surface, it doesn't hold up. What is the Ori technology based on? Are the Replicators even interested in it? Their subplot seems to be just an excuse to put the protagonists in peril and show them firing a bunch of guns, without bringing them down to the Ori's level and having them have to shoot and kill innocent zealous Ori followers. While it is reminiscent of some of the subplots in the show—SG-1 is challenged not only by external threats such as the Goa'uld, but also internal threats such as politicians and the NID—the Replicator subplot is wholly unnecessary and gets in the way of the main point of the film: resolving the Ori threat. The final reveal of the Replicator's latest form is also a bit too on-the-nose for the apparent original idea behind the Replicators. While it is a perfectly acceptable source, the initial fun of the Replicators is that the writers took the concept in new and unique directions, and presented the Replicators in a form that is both a thought provoking visual metaphor and ugh inducing.
The one thing that Stargate: The Ark of Truth excels at is depicting the responsibilities that come with being put in command. It's a thought-provoking illustration that runs counter to the romanticized depiction of being in the captain's chair that often appears in other shows, such as Star Trek. In addition to the ensuing character drama, the writers also do a great job of mining it for humour. All-in-all, Stargate: The Ark of Truth provides a conclusion to the Ori invasion arc, so on that level it is more than worthwhile.
This is Stargate SG-1 on a big budget, and it shows. This film feels much more cinematic in scale, and not merely like a theatrical-length TV episode like 2008's The Ark of Truth does. The main reasons are the return of multitudes of former cast members, the epic scale of the film—both in visual effects as well as filming locations—and the ambitious directing. The film opens with a long take that sees the camera navigate from the gate room, out the left corridor and then into the control room, out the back of that room past the elevator, meeting up with SG-1 at a juncture, and follow them back into the gate room from the right side. It is something that we never got to see on the TV show, and the take is framed so well that we get the sense that the set is much more expansive than it actually is. Another thing that makes Continuum all the more cinematic is that it depicts the protagonists experiencing life-changing trauma on a scale that would be impossible in the TV series. I'm referring here to Jackson's leg being amputated, and the subsequent use of visual effects to remove it in a few key shots, in addition to Shanks's believable performance of a person living with a prosthetic limb. And then there's an actual Los Angeles class submarine that is used not only for a backdrop, but also as a key filming location!
While some of the returning guest stars are literally blink-and-you-miss-it, such as Colin Cunningham (Major Davis) exiting the elevator in the epic opening take, the majority of them get substantially more screen time. The most loaded sequence is when Baal addresses the Goa'uld System Lords. We get not only Baal (Cliff Simon) and his partner Qetesh (Claudia Black), but also Camulus (Steve Bacic), Nirrti (Jacqueline Samuda), Cronus (Ron Halder), and Yu (Vince Crestejo). This is further enhanced when Teal'c brings in Apophis, played by the always engaging Peter Williams! In addition, Continuum brings back not only William DeVane (President Henry Hayes) and Richard Dean Anderson (Jack O'Neill)—who was sorely missed in The Ark of Truth—but also the great Don S. Davis (George Hammond). I've included the names of the actors to highlight that Continuum not only has the characters, but the original actors that played them. The exception is Ra in the Goa'uld System Lords scene, who, if memory serves, was never depicted without a mask covering his face in the TV series.
Perhaps the only drawback to Continuum is that we don't see the heroes giving Baal his just desserts. Yes, Baal is eliminated—twice no less—in at least one rather gruesome way, but it isn't as satisfying as it would have been if it was by SG-1's hands. Nevertheless, the film does a great job of concluding the 'Baal's clones' subplot from seasons 9 and 10, as well as reminding us of just how much fun the show has been, especially in the earlier seasons when the main antagonists were the moustache-twirling, villainous Goa'uld. That's not to say that the Ori or even the Wraith are less compelling antagonists, it's just that the Goa'uld are more fun as the villains you love to hate. Due to that, Continuum's greatest achievement is that it makes us want to go back and start rewatching the series from the very beginning. A must see!