Sketchley's Statistics | MRG - play stats here ABOUT LINKS | MAIN INDEX | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LOCATIONS | TRANSLATIONS | FAQ & RULES | UPDATES |
By AARON SKETCHLEY (aaronsketch@HOTdelete_thisMAIL.com) | Ver 2.5 2015.02.25 |
Active Stealth and Stealth Rules |
---|
Table Of Contents | ||
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Active stealth uses an energy field to bend/absorb radar - which is different from radar jamming (which tends to tell users of radar that something is out there, just not exactly where.) Active stealth is not infallible. It creates a hole in the radar returns. At a distance or in space, that hole in the return is virtually invisible. However, at close range (normal background noise disappears) or when the user is travelling in front of another object that's within the effective radar range, the hole shows up (for sensor operators that make successful die rolls, of course!)
Active stealth is a feature that can enhance mission success IF it is used properly.
There is a chance, due to the emitted energy field nature of active stealthy, sensor operators may interpret it as a spatial disturbance. In this situation, the target *may* move to avoid the active stealthy equipped vehicle, but doesn't consider it to be a threat due to enemy attack.
The F-117 and B-2 are never employed during daylight hours so the dark coloured vehicles cannot be seen at a distance during a clear blue day. In addition, they never ever fly over, beside or anywhere near radar sites - they fly kilometres away. The reason: defense network in a given area has holes (especially true the larger the area) - either due to malfunction, lackluster sensor operator attention spans or simply large spacing between the sensor arrays. Modern stealth aircraft monopolize on those holes to breach an air defense network. In addition - military tactic planners actually state that stealthy aircraft do not negate radar detection capabilities - they simply decrease the effective detection range of radar. Tactically it means that the holes in a defense network are simply larger for a stealthy aircraft. Stealthy vehicles use this to their advantage by avoiding flying directly over or near places that could detect them and alert aerial defense networks.
Successful users of the tactics of stealth use the tactic of avoidance; meaning that they use every feature of the battlefield to their advantage. Whether that be distance (radar being less effective, especially against stealthy airframes at range,) terrain (mountain ranges, forest and flying nape of the Earth all are tactics that successfully avoid radar,) light conditions (vehicles are far more visible in daylight,) the aforementioned dark colouration and holes in air defense networks and so on.
This concept may be hard to grasp, so I will illustrate it with the traditional master of stealth: the Ninja. The tactics of the ninja are exactly the same as stealthy aircraft: avoid detection, move where the opponent either cannot detect or routinely examine/patrol, precisely strike the target and then quickly retreat via the same tactics used during the approach.
The ninja employs shadows, trees, eaves and rafters of buildings and even furniture to accomplish the ninja's objective of stealthily approaching and attacking its target. If the black garbed ninja were to run across an open field in broad daylight, the ninja will be spotted with ease and eliminated long before the ninja becomes a threat. However, if the ninja uses the tactics of stealth, secrecy and prowls successfully, they will lethally strike from the shadows and successfully retreat before their target's defenses can be raised and become effective.
There is no difference between an active or passive stealth equipped VF and the tactics of a ninja. Remember, virtually all of the time it is a far greater success to sneak into an opponents fortifications, eliminate the one mission objective that defeats the enemy and make your escape, than it is wading through a gazillion peons, each of them of equal power to you.
Emissions control is very important to remaining stealthy. Basically, if the player uses the radio, has their active radar on, and/or uses IR, they've effectively decided to light themselves up like a Christmas Tree in a dark room.
When sensors are used in active scanning mode the sensors have 200% greater range, but the user will stand out like a sore thumb on enemy targeting sensors (+1 to strike for anyone attacking them.)
In an atmosphere, speeds below mach one are recommended, as higher speeds causes friction that creates a detectable heat source (the skin of the aerospace vehicle) and a detectable wake.
Global modifiers to detect VF sized users of active stealthy:
Doppler Radar | |
strong winds | -25% |
Storm force winds | -50% |
Hurricane/typhoon force winds | -75% |
Dection Modifiers | Passive Stealthy (VF-17): | Airframes designed for active stealth: | Airframes not designed for active stealth: |
Base modifier (flying with the stealthiest portions towards the search radar): | -80% | -60% | -50% |
Base modifier (flying with the medium stealthiest portions towards the search radar): | -65% | -60% | -50% |
Base modifier (flying with the least stealthiest portions towards the search radar): | -50% | -60% | -50% |
Opening concealed weapons bay: | +20% | +20% | +20% |
Flying nap of the Earth: read sensor instruments at | 2% | 2% | 2% |
Flying behind cover at low speeds: read sensory instruments at | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Flying above Mach 1: | +10% | +10% | +10% |
Flying above Mach 2: | +20% | +20% | +20% |
Broadcasting on the radio - micro to short duration: | +35% | +35% | +40% |
Broadcasting on the radio - medium duration: | +70% | +70% | +80% |
Broadcasting on the radio - long duration to constant: read sensory instruments at | 98% | 98% | 98% |
Minor damage to airframe: | +15% | +15% | +20% |
Medium damage to airframe: | +30%* | +30%* | +40%* |
Major damage to airframe: | +45%** | +45%** | +60%** |
* 30% chance of active stealth failure. Roll again in 1D10 minutes or after every subsequent hit.
** 60% chance of active stealth failure. Roll again in 1D4 minutes or after every subsequent hit
Notes: Maximum modifier always leaves a 2% chance of detection, unless if the 'Read Sensory skill at' is indicated. Read Sensory Instruments at 0% indicates no chance to detect. 98% means that unless the sensor operator is a complete twit, you're going to be spotted.
Does active stealth erase the gravitational and electromagnetic fields that a vehicle has?
No. Active Stealth may actually increase the electromagnetic field a vehicle creates. These fields are much easier to detect in deep space where the background magnetic noise is minimal.
Does active stealth hide or conceal the stream of particles released by the vehicle's engines?
No. In an atmosphere, these are normally undetectable (beyond heat and some potentially unique radiation emitted from the thermonuclear engines.) In deep space, these streams of particles could forseeably be used to track a vehicle. However, the trail won't remain very long due to such things as the solar wind.
Is the active stealth energy field going to appear as a spatial disturbance?
Possibly, it depends on the training and success rate of the sensor operators in question. If yes, there is a large chance that the enemy will flee the approaching spatial disturbance without realizing it's true nature.
REFERENCES
|
|
TOP | LEGAL | MAIN INDEX |