Sketchley's Translations Main Index | Macross Portal |
By AARON SKETCHLEY (aaronsketch@HOTdelete_thisMAIL.com) | Ver 1.6 2024.06.30 |
An Unexpected Journey does right by the original The Hobbit book, and has all the key scenes from roughly the first half of the book. The movie is nicely filled with character (and world) introductions, sword and sorcery action, and most importantly: character growth. As this film echoes the plot of The Fellowship Of The Ring, it feels like a natural outgrowth of that trilogy. Gollum steals the show when he appears, but Martin Freeman truly embodies Bilbo Baggins. As this film also serves as a sequel to Dir. Jackson's Lord Of The Rings (LotR) trilogy, the film is also replete with scenes fleshing out the background and origin of certain events in the LotR series. Among the additions, I especially liked Radagast the Brown, played to perfection by Sylvester McCoy. And then there's the foreshadowing of the coming war of the ring, the return of Sauron, seeing the White Council in operation, and how there's a lot more going on in the background behind Thorin's quest—Saurman actively attempting to stop it, Azog out for Thorin's blood, and so on.
Obviously, with so many dwarfs, the production team had to focus on only a few of them and give the rest just enough for the casual viewer to differentiate between them. The team also introduces a powerful antagonist in the form of Azog, and the fuel that his story arc provides to the movie is one of the better additions to this first chapter. As Azog is present in the LotR appendixes, it's probably better to think of him as an embellished character, rather than as a wholly new addition. As I mention in one of the LotR reviews, Dir. Jackson is adapting J.R.R. Tolkien's stories to the big screen, and not slavishly reproducing them. Azog is a good example of an addition that not only makes The Hobbit's story more cinematic, it also provides a good reason to give this film a decent climax.
The only real misstep in this film is the sequence with the stone giants. It's just too much of a stretch of an imagination that no one in the company of Dwarves would escape serious injury and death with that amount of solid rock raining down around around them. The depiction in the book is far better, with the company witnessing the stone giants from a distance and playing a game of catch with giant boulders. Whether or not the giants are literally "stone", as the film depicts, is a discussion for somewhere else. An Unexpected Journey is an excellent addition to the LotR saga, and if you enjoyed the LotR trilogy, you'll definitely get a kick out of this film.
When I first saw this film, I had just reread the novel. Suffice to say, I was surprised at the additions to the first movie (a lot of which were resolved when I read the indexes at the end of Return Of The King), and the creative 'interpretations' (I'm looking at you, rock giants.) Going into this second movie, I knew a few important things, such as the novel was about halfway over, and there was an excellent opportunity coming up right away to reintroduce all of the main characters—specifically the manner in which the book reintroduces them all as they enter Beorn's house. I was flabbergasted that the movie not only misses that great opportunity, it practically neglects to introduce, develop and expand upon the dwarves at all! I sympathize that there are arguably too many to effectively juggle in a movie, and that the decision to leave some of them in Lake Town as the rest go up the Lonely Mountain is justified simply for clarity. However, I also feel that the dwarves take precedent over the secondary characters. It is those secondary characters that this movie takes the time to introduce and develop, with some of them not even being in the novel! That's not to say that those new characters are wholly unnecessary, as they do allow for a modicum of character development in the main dwarf company. Alas, by the end of the movie, the plight of the dwarves, and a lot of my sympathy for them, had been replaced with concern for the residents of Lake Town.
The other disappointment was that despite the dwarves being on a multi-month long quest, they are depicted breathlessly running everywhere in the film! I didn't like that, as instead of taking the time to develop certain scenes and the setting, they and the movie race right through them. One thing that the movie has going for it is its decent pacing, and I don't think any scene overstays its welcome. In a way, however, one wishes that certain scenes, especially near the beginning, were longer, with a bit more time spent on developing the core characters. Nevertheless, the conclusion of the movie is breathtakingly epic, and in the process, develops the interior of the Kingdom Under The Mountain; something that the book never really got around to doing. That said, I found myself mentally shouting, "they ended it there?!", when the film concludes—in part because of the cliffhanger, but also because at that point the book is pretty much finished, with only a few chapters remaining for the 144 minute-long sequel!
I was disappointed by this film. The film is mostly oriented around setting up and depicting a large battle. However, because the film overdoes that at the expense of reintroducing, let alone developing its characters, I found myself not caring about what happened to any of them. The exception is Bard, but even that ended up being a bit too saccharine and predictable for my taste. Thorin was completely unrecognizable. While the out-of-character actions are true to the novel—as he's bewitched by the gold-madness that befalls those who become King Under The Mountain—the much subtler way that it was introduced and depicted in The Desolation Of Smaug was much more effective. In short, Thorin still behaved like himself, most of the time. Once again, the other dwarves are also virtually ignored, and are only depicted as either moping around the caverns or building stone-works in inhumanly short time frames. This film was a missed opportunity to further explore the kingdom under the mountain, while also showing us sides of the dwarves that aren't necessarily present in the book.
The new bits that flesh out the greater Middle Earth saga are a mixed bunch: some are interesting, but others are more distracting then they are entertaining (where did the goats come from that Thorin used to race up the side of the mountain during the battle?) The battle between the White Council and Sauron (the Necromancer) was also, oddly, out of step with those kinds of battles in the preceding The Lord of the Rings films, where they had been presented as much as a battle of wills as a contest of physical fighting prowess. The depiction of a hectic, video game-esque sword fight between corporeal and non-corporeal opponents was jarring, and it makes the relatively slower-paced sword fights that come later all the more monotonous. Nevertheless, the highlights of the film are Smaug's all too brief appearance at the beginning, the scenes depicting the fortress at Gundabad, and Bilbo's return to the Shire at the very end. The latter sequence is, regrettably, the only time that the film truly comes alive with characterization. It was a joy to behold Hobbiton once more, Bilbo's troubles with his estranged relatives, and hear the immortal line, "put that pouf down!"
Gandalf returns to the Shire and warns Frodo to leave. As Frodo departs with his friend Samwise Gamgee, Gandalf rides to Isengard to meet with the wizard Saruman, but discovers his betrayal and alliance with Sauron, who has dispatched his nine undead Nazgûl servants to find Frodo. Frodo and Sam are joined by fellow hobbits Merry and Pippin, and they evade the Nazgûl before arriving in Bree, where they are meant to meet Gandalf. However, Gandalf never arrives, having been taken prisoner by Saruman. The hobbits are then aided by a Ranger named Strider, who promises to escort them to Rivendell. As they travel overland, they are closely stalked by the Nazgûl. The Elf Arwen locates and rescues them, summoning flood-waters to sweep the Nazgûl away. She then takes them to Rivendell, where they are protected by the Elves. Learning of Sarumon's betrayal from Gandalf, who escaped Isengard, and now realizing that they are facing threats from both Sauron and Saruman, Arwen's father Lord Elrond decides against keeping the Ring in Rivendell. He holds a council of Elves, Men, and Dwarves, also attended by Frodo and Gandalf, that decides that the Ring must be destroyed in the fires of Mount Doom. Frodo volunteers to take the Ring; accompanied by Gandalf, Sam, Merry, Pippin, Legolas, Gimli, Boromir, and Strider—who is actually Aragorn, Isildur's heir. The Fellowship of the Ring makes for the Gap of Rohan, but discovers it is being watched by Saruman's spies. They then have to choose whether to brave the treacherous mountain pass of Caradhras, or risk the dangers that were awoken by the Dwarves when they built the Mines of Moria under the mountains. Concurrently, the ring is tempting and slowly corrupting members of the fellowship, who start to formulate their own designs on the One Ring!
While the above summarizes the overall plot of The Fellowship of the Ring, the movie—and story—is so, so much more. In many ways the film is as much about the people, places, cultures, legends and ruins as it is about the plot. Dir. Jackson largely captures and recreates the spirit of the book, if not the essence of it. While Jackson's film recreates the major story beats of the books, it is not a slavish reproduction. It is truly an adaptation, that arguably does the best one can do in adapting a 423 page novel into a 3 hour movie (almost 4 hours in the Extended Edition!) while also adding and embellishing things that are not possible in book form: music and spoken language come first to mind.
It is hard to find fault in the film. Perhaps its only weakness is its length—which is concurrently one of its greatest strengths! Nevertheless, parts of the story had to be trimmed, and due to that, the significance of certain things changes or is lessened. The prime example is the Tom Bombadil–Barrow Wights episode just before the hobbits arrive in Bree. While Bombadil would be a character that would only serve to get in the way of the film's pace and building tension, the significance of the swords the hobbits acquire is also lost (admittedly depicting their significance would also be hard to do without further disrupting the flow of the film). Just from that we can appreciate the monumental challenge that Jackson and his production team faced, and makes their film achievement all the more impressive. Arguably the best thing about the film is that Jackson gives us mere tastes of key things without overindulging and being repetitive (such as the encounter with the Balrog), while also retaining as much of J.R.R. Tolkien's rich detail as possible (such as the hand-like tips of the Watcher in the Water's tentacles), giving the film great replay value. A must see!
While the heroes cover far less ground than they did in The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers is all the more epic in breadth and scale. Part of this is due to splitting the fellowship into multiple groups, each with a unique quest. The genius of Dir. Jackson and writers Walsh, Boyens, and Sinclair is that not only do they give each group something to do—arguably an element lacking in the original book—they also restructure the books so that the movie depicts each group's actions progressing concurrently. Just like The Fellowship of the Ring, this film is not a slavish reproduction of the novels, but an adaptation for the silver screen. And due to that, we get such great additions as giving certain characters more agency, emphasizing the corruptive power of the One Ring, and getting a greater sense of how interwoven things are. For example, in the extended version, we not only get to see the tone of Faramir and Boromir's relationship, but also how Denethor treats each one and his reasons for tasking Boromir with attending the Council of Elrond as Gondor's representative.
The only real flaw in the film is the depiction of the telepathic conversation between Elrond and Galadriel. It is confusingly presented, as it doesn't clearly depict where they are in relationship to each other; not to mention falling hot on the heals of a flashback depicting a conversation between Aragorn and Arwen just before the fellowship left Rivendell. Speaking of Arwen, it is a shame that the character was sidelined for most of this film. The few scenes that she gets, though, are poignant, as she grapples with the choice of leaving—and remaining immortal—or staying, and eventually losing her love Aragorn to old age and being condemned to slowly fade away as she lives out her long life in solitary grief. Nevertheless, it is an understandable compromise, as the 179 minute film is already fully loaded with excellent characters and sequences. The film never gets boring nor does it overstay its welcome, in other words. It is the middle chapter with less of a focus on Frodo and Sam, but in a way, that is exactly what's in the novel: the hobbits attempting to stealthily enter Mordor, while their fellowship companions undertake more visible deeds that ultimately serve to distract Sauron and his allies from the hobbits. A must see!
The Return of the King deftly continues telling the divergent stories of the protagonists and shows how—even though they are separated by vast distances and not fully aware of what their comrades are doing—they are intimately linked together as each of their actions influences and affects the obstacles and challenges that their comrades face. The film is, on the whole, more 'action' than 'character'. That's not to say that it doesn't have lots of wonderful character moments, but they are mainly limited to the hobbits. The film is dominated by the stupendously large-scale siege on Minas Tiruth in the middle stretch of the film. It is a marvellous spectacle to behold. The sequence, however, ends somewhat abruptly with the appearance of the Army of the Dead. Nevertheless, the film immediately takes a poignant turn as we see the heroes dealing with and coming to terms with their losses and injuries.
The main drawback is that there is not enough sequences with Arwen. She gets a powerful scene in the early part of the film that gives her a glimpse of her fate on Middle-earth being more than just death and loneliness, which ultimate drives her decision to stay and become mortal. The film, however, soon forgets about her as it focuses on the external and internal battles of the heroes in their respective quests to not be overwhelmed by Sauron's forces as they attempt to destroy the ring. While Dir. Jackson already covered it in the earlier films, one or two more scenes on Arwen and Aragorn's relationship with her would have been a good opportunity to remind the audience of Aragorn's hesitancy at claiming Gondor's throne. Nevertheless, we get the wonderful depiction of Éowyn and Pippin not only travelling to Théoden's rendezvous point, but also continuing with the warriors and ultimately fighting on the battlefield in front of Minas Turith. What is most remarkable about these sequences is not just their willingness to risk their lives to help their friends and loved ones, but also their growing comradeship and how they continually help each other—right up to their climactic encounter with the Witch-king!
The film's final battle at the gates of Mordor isn't so much about the combined forces of the men of the West versus Sauron's armies, but of Frodo—who by now is consumed by the Ring and refuses to throw it into the fires of Mount Doom—and Gollum, as they wrestle for control of the Ring. That battle and the subsequent scenes depicting the ramifications of its outcome truly make this film series epic. Thereafter, the film goes through multiple endings as we see the heroes part ways, get on with their lives back in Hobbiton, and eventually some of them leaving with the elves for the Undying Lands. Would it have been better to have broken those endings up with the brief battle described in the Scouring of the Shire, the penultimate chapter of the book? Or would that have been even more anticlimactic and distressing, as that chapter depicts a Shire spoiled by industrialization and full of pollution. Is Dir. Jackson's version better with the hobbits returning to an unspoiled home that they have successfully protected? Or would seeing them able to stand on their own without relying on wizards or men to fight for them have been better? One suspects that the former is better, as Jackson has depicted their moral fortitude and newfound strengths so well throughout his masterpiece. While a few have said that the multiple endings outstay their welcome, the film is a masterpiece.