Sketchley's Translations Main Index | Macross Portal |
By AARON SKETCHLEY (aaronsketch@HOTdelete_thisMAIL.com) | Ver 1.11 2023.12.26 |
Memento Batman Begins The Prestige |
The Dark Knight Inception |
The Dark Knight Rises Interstellar |
Dunkirk Tenet |
This film hits the ground running, and doesn't let up until the end credits. It answers questions we have had—and some that we didn't even know we had—about where Bruce comes from, what motivates him, and how he becomes Batman. The answers Dir. Nolan gives us are not only very satisfying, they are also sometimes challenging. Along the way, we see Bruce tinkering with and refining the Batman persona, as well as the sacrifices he must make in the process of assuming the Batman alter ego. One thing I really liked is how Batman is depicted not as a one-man show but as part of a greater team of willing as well as unaware allies. The film also presents the titular character's vulnerabilities and limitations, which humanizes him and enhances the film's plausibility. The myriad of villains that round out this film are all fresh and interesting. They also add additional layers and depth to not only the story and setting, but also the Bruce Wayne character.
The film's visuals are another standout feature of the film, with cinematography that is breathtakingly beautiful at times. Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard's music also has a je ne sais quoi that elevates the film to another level. Overall, the story is relatively easy to follow as Dir. Nolan doesn't manipulate time very often in this film. While the front end of the film is layered with flashbacks, they are presented chronologically in parallel to the film's 'now', and used to explain things as they become relevant; such as why Bruce is in a Bhutanese prison at the beginning. However, large sections of the film—especially at the beginning—are presented in a concentrated form, and one has to be paying attention in order to completely grasp what Nolan is aiming for. That said, arguably the only flaw to film is that it renders Joel Schumacher's Batman films almost unwatchable due to their lack of attention on the main character. While virtually any actor could have played the titular role in those films, it is hard to imagine anyone but Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne in Batman Begins and its sequels. This film is a must see, not just because it is a great film, but also because of the impact it continues to have on subsequent films, both within and outside the superhero genre!
The Prestige makes magic its focus, but it isn't so much about magic per se, but obsessions and the lengths people go toward them, and the high cost they pay in doing so. One of the highlights of the film is the magic, and how so-called magicians perform their illusions. Naturally, it evolves into experiments and illusions that use electricity, something that intriguingly still has magical properties for many people even in this day and age. While the film appears to break its own rules and employs some 'true' magic, it's quite acceptable as it ultimately enhances the tragic horror of the duelling magicians. That said, the film does require a certain suspension of disbelief: could those magicians have been so good with makeup and disguise that they could successfully hide their true identity from their opposite even at point blank range? While it's true that building interiors were considerably dimmer in the era that this film takes place, it still feels like a step too far into the fantastical.
Nevertheless, like all Nolan films, this one gets better on repeat viewings. On the one hand, it helps make a bit more sense of the non-linear storytelling, but on the other, it's wonderful discovering the hints and clues about the two protagonists—and the film is loaded with them. Speaking of the protagonists, it is remarkable that they are neither portrayed as good nor evil; amoral at best. That duality is reinforced with a surprising amount of parallelism in the film: both Angier and his wife die by hanging, the protagonist's deadly rivalry is mirrored in Tesla and Edison's rivalry, and so on.
Above all else, thise film is a good mystery—or illusion,as the movie defines it. Even if you missed the clues, the reveal at the end is still shocking as we grasp the true, horrific extent of the magicians' attempts to outdo each other. This is one of those film that stays with you long after the end credits. Can't be missed!
The Dark Knight is a complex film. It is ostensibly about escalation, but it is also an examination of the lies that people tell either to themselves, or to other people for the greater good. Into the mix comes the Joker, who is essentially an anarchist, but is also motivated to corrupt people into becoming like him if given enough of a metaphorical push.
This film has all the right elements (acting, effects, music) and makes some very pointed observations and arguments, but it just doesn't add together completely. A common theme in Dir. Nolan's films is the manipulation of time. While Batman Begins and The Dark Knight Rises are comparative lightweights among his works, The Dark Knight doesn't have any. I'd also describe Nolan's films as 'breathless'—in the sense that they have so much to say—such as Inception, Interstellar, and even Batman Begins. This film, however, doesn't feel like that aside from the first reel, and the last ten minutes. The rest? Paraphrasing Wikipedia: 'the film is always climaxing, and scenes are cut off just as they're getting interesting.' That 'constant climaxing' ends up deadening the senses, and coupled with the cutting off, it prevents some of the film's most important points from making a proper impact.
Bruce Wayne is also practically invisible for most of the film, which is disappointing, as he was the most interesting character in Batman Begins. The other character largely missing from this film is Gotham City itself. Maybe Nolan gave the city a bright makeover to make the film more relevant to the intended audience, but it came at the cost of eliminating a lot of the inner city grunge—the very thing that spawned Batman and gives him his raison d'être. As the movie is full of excellent, believable performances, and as each scene more or less works on its own, I'm left wondering if the movie overreached itself and that was complicated by the untimely passing of Heath Ledger. Speaking of Ledger, his performance is one of the main reasons to see this film. While the film doesn't necessarily get better on repeat viewings, noticing new aspects and subtleties to Ledger's performance makes it more than worthwhile.
In a word, Inception is a 'breathless' film—in that it has almost continuous exposition in order to not only explain the plot, but also the 'rules' of shared dreaming. Due to that, the film is highly memorable for having created an entirely new dimension for filmmakers to explore, and that's despite the film's spectacular action sequences! Perhaps the most memorable aspect of the film is how aspects of events happening at a shallower dream level influence and effect the dream at deeper levels. Which is further compounded by how much more time passes the deeper the dream level is. This results in some truly astounding effects, which are made all the more impressive as Dir. Nolan prefers practical effects over CG!
Despite its strokes of creative genius and outstanding visual effects, the film also has excellent characterization. While the film may have focused more on exposition, it still provides an assortment of well-rounded characters with many of them facing tragic circumstances. The emotional payoffs in the climax and conclusion are genuinely earned, and are truly cathartic. The film ultimately transcends its genres and technical achievements in effects, and becomes something truly sublime by an auteur at the top of his game. A definite must see—and one that truly gets better on repeat viewings!
Dir. Nolan returns to form in the Batman series with this film that continues from where Batman Begins left off in probing what drives Bruce Wayne on. Nolan's Batman is as much about the present and the future, as it is about looking back on the past for the motivations and the causes. This film is about what it takes to be Batman—in the sense of the willpower needed (what makes Wayne a 'super' hero), and the emotional and physical costs involved—and unflinchingly examines both. It's not always pretty, but through it the Wayne character is rounded out even more than we could have hoped for. That deep examination of Wayne is what makes this film one of the better ones in Nolan's series. More than the title character alter ego, it is Wayne himself who is the most interesting thing about Batman.
Hans Zimmer's score is also a highlight of the film. Not only does it revisit the themes from the preceding films, he also incorporates aspects of the story into the score—sometimes even before we're aware of its significance (arguably another reason why Nolan's films get better when watched again). At one point, I found myself marvelling at the apparent co-opting of Bane's theme by Batman's in the climax! Great stuff.
I really liked the film's running theme of questioning 'how much is enough?' and 'when is it time to move on?'. Questions that the viewer readily answers, but the film holds off answering until the very end. And oh, what an end! The film keeps building and building and building to a truly cathartic payoff. In an era of endless sequels, it's great to have a proper conclusion to a film franchise.
I went into this movie with trepidation, as it was billed as a science fiction film on par with 2001: A Space Odyssey and saw the creation of three (!) scientific papers, but was generally panned by the Internet movie-going public. Suffice to say, my expectations were more than surpassed! It had me firing on all cylinders—and that was before they even launched into space! The way the film introduces the setting and characters creates a solid foundation for why they must make the journey, the stakes involved, and most importantly: the emotional bedrock underlying it all. That emotional bedrock, and the character growth and choices stemming from it, have made this film truly unforgettable. I've seen many films, but it's the sentiments and advice of the characters in this one that have remained with me. Perhaps my perspective as an expat parent has made the actions and emotions in this film that much more understandable and poignant for me.
One of the things I really liked about this film is its depiction of near-future space travel. Perhaps more than the broad strokes of space travel, it was the small touches that really got me; such as what 'music' do astronauts listen to? In addition to the thought-provoking real science of the film—ranging from the effects of time dilation to what a black hole would actually look like—it is also fully loaded with mysteries. For example, the film never details the blight that is killing all edible crops, is extremely vague about what happened to the Earth between our 'now' and the film's 'now', and who and what the 'bulk beings' are. That is all in addition to subtle digs on how politics shape education, people being graded on a bell curve to limit access to higher education (ostensibly due to lack of space and funding) and a sly reference to how over-consumerism is bad for the planet.
The more one digs into the film, including its production side, the deeper it gets. Oddly enough, one of the film's greatest 'practical effects' are the cornfields. It's not so much the crop per se, but where they were grown and filmed. This ties in nicely with one of the films more subtle aspects: almost everything on the family's dinner table is corn based. Perhaps even more subtle are the titles of the books that are pushed off of the bookshelf. Most of them directly tie into the theme of the movie, its science, or the situation that the characters find themselves in.
Interstellar is another bold step forward by Dir. Nolan. By focusing as much on the inner, mental challenges as the external, physical ones, he has succeeded in creating an emotionally tought, thought provoking movie. It is arguably Nolan's best film. Highly recommended.
Dunkirk is concurrently a nail-biting and thought provoking film. This is partially because the story is told from three perspectives with different time dilations: land (one week), sea (one day), and air (one hour). Due to that, we are shown events both after and before they take place—often in that order! Some characters (Cillian Murphy's Shivering Soldier for example) are shown after and before they undergone a traumatic experience, and how it drastically changes them. In other scenes, what we initially perceive as a relatively successful result later turns out to be anything but! In many ways, the film is a lot more rewarding once the viewer grasps what Dir. Nolan is doing, and is arguably better on rewatches due to that.
The other challenging aspect of the film is that Dir. Nolan is interested in depicting how individual actions—whether self-serving or selfless—add up to the overall success or failure of the entire evacuation. Nolan doesn't bother with providing the backstories and future plans of the characters, and in a certain sense each character is a composite of the actions and behaviour of several people. In many ways, that makes the film more powerful as the soldiers are more relatable as their actions and choices are made from desperation and an overwhelming desire for survival. While the film is hardly gruesome, it is incredibly tense from start to finish. The film's strongest lasting impression is the sheer desperation of the men to not just survive, but to get off the beach as soon as possible!
The highlight of the film is that pretty much everything was filmed practically—with only a minimal amount of CG—under Hoyte van Hoytema's cinematography. While the former adds infinitely to the realism of the film, the later makes it all look remarkably beautiful. The only drawback to the film is that it doesn't really address the struggles of the French soldiers who were trapped at Dunkirk along with the British. Nevertheless, the film is a tour de force by an auteur at the top of his game. And while it has all the hallmarks of a Nolan film (practical effects, nonlinear storytelling, Michael Caine, etc.), it is also unique in Nolan's catalogue as a film that isn't going breathless from all the dialogue explaining what's going on. A must see!
Tenet is a true mind-bender. Its time manipulation theme is similar to that of Memento, in which a pair of storylines are moving concurrently both forwards and backwards in time toward a common point. The key twist is that in Tenet, the backwards flowing one is literally moving backwards, and often occurs concurrently to the forward flowing one. This results in not only viewing the same sequence from a different perspective, but experiencing it 'backwards' as one set of characters progresses 'forward' through it.
Confused? I was the first time I saw the film. Nevertheless, I found two quotes in the film to be helpful in unlocking the story: "Don't try to understand it, feel it.", and "There is no first wave—Red Team and Blue Team operate simultaneously. Don't get on the chopper if you can't stop thinking in linear terms." One recurring motif is a pincer movement. However, the film takes pains to note that it's not a pincer movement in 'space', but in 'time'.
This is one of those rare films that becomes more and more understandable (and enjoyable!) the more times one watches it. All the more so as you become aware of what kind of clues to pay attention to. While some have complained that the dialogue is drowned out or hard to hear at times, in a recent viewing I realized that that was the director's way of telling us not to focus on that—in one sequence, the in-movie dialogue had even just instructed one character to pay attention to something else!
Tenet is very well acted, directed, and framed. I found the action sequences set up and filmed extremely well—and despite the dense script and mind-bending concept, the visuals are very clear and easy to follow. What I like most about the film is that the beginning and ending of the movie are not necessarily the start and end of the story (if such concepts are even applicable!) This is a film unlike any before, and due to the complaints it has received, most likely not going to be reproduced any time soon.